The first study to map B2B technology brands across both human memory and machine recommendation — revealing who is truly winning the modern buying journey.

The traditional Rule of Three says buyers choose from a small, entrenched set of vendors they already know. This study set out to test whether AI is reinforcing — or reshaping — that dynamic.
You’d be hard-pressed to find a B2B marketer who hasn’t come across the idea of mental availability. Popularised by the Ehrenberg-Bass Institute, in a nutshell, it’s the probability that a buyer will think of your brand in a relevant buying situation. Most importantly, it proposes that buying comes from memory, not loyalty.
Today, legacy fame isn’t enough to keep your brand at the top. In the age of Generative Engine Optimisation (GEO), true market leadership requires a dual strategy: you must be remembered by human buyers and recommended by language models.
To assess who’s actually winning the B2B tech landscape, we built the Mental Av-AI-lability Index — mapping brands across both the mental and AI availability axes to reveal four distinct realities.
The B2B landscape has fractured as the gap between human perception and machine logic has grown. The brands shaping the next decade won’t simply be the most established — they will be the most understood.

Rather than produce a report about B2B tech brands and act like we had it all figured out, the bravest thing we could do was to analyse ourselves first. We are a B2B service provider facing the exact same challenges as you — long sales cycles, a need for third-party validation, and a complex competitive landscape.
We are effectively turning our own brand into a lab — testing new tools, prompt structures, and optimisation tactics on ourselves first, to de-risk the future for you. Instead of a lecture, this is a journey.
“The 95-5 rule tells us that 95% of your buyers aren’t in the market right now. But they are using AI to build their mental shortlists right now. Every touchpoint is now a cookie crumb that biases the future AI search in your favour.”
We’ll use the Mental Av-AI-lability Index methodology to assess your brand’s position. Complete the form and a member of our team will be in touch.
The Mental Av-AI-lability Index is a research study from Babel and Sapio Research that maps leading B2B technology brands across two dimensions: mental availability, or how well human buyers recall a brand, and algorithmic availability, or how often AI tools recommend it. It plots brands into four quadrants across the telecoms, cybersecurity and enterprise sectors in the UK and US, showing where each one stands as buyers increasingly rely on AI for vendor discovery.
Mental availability is the degree to which a brand comes to mind for human buyers during a purchase decision, built through long-term brand building and category entry points. AI availability, also called algorithmic availability, is how likely large language models such as ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity are to surface and recommend that brand. The index argues that brands now need to perform on both axes, because strong human recall no longer guarantees a brand will appear in AI-generated shortlists.
Brands fall into one of four quadrants. Titans have high human recall and high AI recommendation, leading on both. Sleeping Giants are famous with people but largely invisible to AI. Algorithmic Disruptors are less well known to buyers but are engineered for AI discovery. The Untapped sit low on both axes, with significant room to grow.
Generative Engine Optimisation, or GEO, is the practice of optimising a brand's content so it is discovered, understood and recommended by AI answer engines rather than only ranking on traditional search results pages. Where SEO targets search engines, GEO targets large language models. Core tactics include ungating content, structuring data for machine consumption, raising the profile of company executives and earning citations in trusted third-party media.
Buyers increasingly turn to AI tools early in the research and evaluation process to discover vendors, validate options and build their shortlists. In the research, among buyers who selected a new vendor for a recent large purchase, almost a third found that vendor using an AI tool, more than used a search engine or an analyst report. This shift toward zero-click, AI-led discovery means a brand that does not surface in AI responses risks being left off the shortlist entirely.
The index identifies a group of Sleeping Giants, brands with strong human recognition that AI rarely recommends. The most common cause is locking valuable content behind forms and paywalls, since AI models cannot complete lead-capture forms and simply turn to competitors with open, accessible data. Fragmented PR visibility and weak, unstructured website data compound the problem, leaving these brands out of AI-generated recommendations despite their fame.
The report sets out a framework for building machine trust to match human trust. It recommends ungating valuable content so AI models can read it, structuring data with clear formatting such as FAQs, modular sections and bulleted lists, raising the online profile of company executives, and earning citations in trusted third-party media through PR. Together these signals help AI engines recognise a brand as an authority and recommend it during buyers' research.
The index covers three B2B technology verticals, telecoms, cybersecurity and enterprise, each broken down into sub-sectors. Brands are mapped separately for the UK and US markets, drawing on a survey of 400 senior technology decision-makers at organisations with at least 500 employees.
There is more to come. The next step is a blueprint on marketing and communicating to both human and machine: creating your strategy for a zero-click future. It arrives in Autumn 2026, with a first look for Brave Collective members. Join the Brave Collective: babelpr.com/brave-collective